Posh Law - The Power of Acknowledgment

Why the Preliminary Review Defines POSH Investigations.

Once a complaint of sexual harassment is formally received under the POSH Act, 2013, the next crucial stage is the acknowledgment and preliminary review. This step, though often overlooked, is where the Internal Committee (IC) establishes credibility, assures the complainant of fairness, and ensures the case proceeds within the boundaries of law. It is both a procedural necessity and a trust-building exercise.

1. Acknowledging the Complaint

The first duty of the IC after receipt of a complaint is to acknowledge it formally. This should be done in writing and in a manner that conveys sensitivity, confidentiality, and seriousness. A good acknowledgment letter typically includes:

  • Confirmation of receipt of the complaint.
  • A reassurance of confidentiality throughout the process.
  • A brief outline of the next steps in the inquiry.
  • The case reference number for tracking and record-keeping.

Such acknowledgment not only reassures the complainant but also demonstrates that the organization has a structured redressal mechanism.

2. Preliminary Review of the Complaint

Before initiating inquiry, the IC must conduct a preliminary review to determine whether the case falls under the scope of POSH. The review involves examining:

  • Nature of allegations: Do they qualify as sexual harassment under Section 2(n) of the POSH Act? (For example, unwelcome sexual advances, sexually colored remarks, physical contact, or conduct of a sexual nature.)
  • Workplace connection: Did the incident occur at the workplace, or in a setting arising out of employment (such as office parties, off-site meetings, client visits, or virtual work platforms)?
  • Jurisdiction: Is the respondent an employee of the organization, or does the case involve third parties such as clients, vendors, or contractors?
  • Timelines: Has the complaint been filed within the prescribed period (3 months, extendable to 6 months in justified cases)?

If the matter does not qualify under POSH, the IC must guide the complainant to the appropriate forum — for example, grievance redressal, HR disciplinary committee, or ethics hotline.

3. Importance of Sensitivity and Neutrality

The preliminary review is not about deciding guilt or innocence but about confirming whether the IC is the correct authority to handle the case. The tone at this stage must remain:

  • Sensitive: Respecting the complainant’s courage in coming forward.
  • Neutral: Avoiding prejudgment of the facts.
  • Confidential: Ensuring no premature disclosure within the organization.

4. Why Step 2 Matters

This step ensures that:

  • No case is mishandled: Complaints are routed to the right authority.
  • Legal timelines are honored: The 90-day inquiry period starts only after this review.
  • Trust is reinforced: The complainant knows the matter is being treated seriously.
  • Due process is maintained: Preventing challenges later on grounds of procedural lapses.

Conclusion

Step 2 of POSH investigation, Acknowledgment and Preliminary Review, is where organizations demonstrate their seriousness in upholding workplace dignity. By acknowledging complaints promptly and reviewing them carefully, the IC lays the groundwork for a credible, transparent, and legally compliant inquiry

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Constitution of the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) under the POSH Act: Roles, Structure, and Responsibilities.

The Prevention of Sexual Harassment ( POSH ) Act, 2013, was enacted to address workplace sexual harassment in India and mandates every organization to establish an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC). The ICC plays a pivotal role in ensuring a safe and harassment-free work environment. Its primary responsibility is to investigate complaints of sexual harassment, ensure a fair inquiry, and recommend appropriate action. In this article, we will explore the structure, composition, and responsibilities of the ICC, along with the legal requirements governing its formation and operation. 1. Legal Mandate for the ICC under the POSH Act Under the POSH Act, every employer is legally required to establish an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) in the workplace to handle complaints of sexual harassment. This obligation applies to any organization with 10 or more employees. The ICC must be constituted at every branch or office location where the employee headcount meets this threshold. Failure to ...
Read more

The Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act 2013 in India and the sexual harassment laws in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)

The Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act 2013 in India and the sexual harassment laws in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) serve similar purposes in addressing and preventing sexual harassment in the workplace. However, there are notable differences in their legal frameworks and application due to the distinct cultural, legal, and regulatory contexts of the two countries. Here's a comparative overview: Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act 2013 (India): 1. Scope and Applicability: • The POSH Act applies specifically to workplaces in India, including both public and private sectors, covering employees, interns, and volunteers. • It defines sexual harassment and mandates the establishment of Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs) in organizations to address complaints. 2. Offenses and Definitions: • The Act defines sexual harassment in a comprehensive manner, encompassing various forms of unwelcome behavior, advances, or requests of a sexual nature. • The focus is ...
Read more

Sexual harassment law: Power of IC and Landmark judgement

In the case cited, the courts have provided important clarifications regarding the powers and limitations of internal committees tasked with investigating complaints of harassment or misconduct.  Let's elaborate on each point: Initiation of Investigation: In the case of Shital Prasad Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (2018 SCC Online Raj 1676), the court clarified that an internal committee can initiate an investigation based on a complaint received from any source of authority, provided that the complainant agrees to pursue the matter with the committee. This means that the committee's jurisdiction isn't limited solely to complaints directly submitted to them but extends to complaints forwarded or received from other sources, as long as the complainant consents to the committee's involvement. Implication: The internal committee's role is to address complaints of harassment or misconduct regardless of the source of the complaint. It emphasizes the importance of ...
Read more