Posh Act 2013

In the case cited, the courts have provided important clarifications regarding the powers and limitations of internal committees tasked with investigating complaints of harassment or misconduct.  Let's elaborate on each point: Initiation of Investigation: In the case of Shital Prasad Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (2018 SCC Online Raj 1676), the court clarified that an internal committee can initiate an investigation based on a complaint received from any source of authority, provided that the complainant agrees to pursue the matter with the committee. This means that the committee's jurisdiction isn't limited solely to complaints directly submitted to them but extends to complaints forwarded or received from other sources, as long as the complainant consents to the committee's involvement. Implication: The internal committee's role is to address complaints of harassment or misconduct regardless of the source of the complaint. It emphasizes the importance of ...

Union of India Citation v Banani Chattopadhyay - (2022) 1 HCC (Cal) 351 Court – High Court of Calcutta. Facts of the Case – The petitioner, Banani Chattopadhyay, was a Deputy Manager at Hindustan Cables Ltd. (HCL). She opted for voluntary retirement on 31.01.2017 following a decision to close down the company. After retirement, she was engaged on a temporary basis as a consultant and later as an advisor. She was released from her temporary engagement on 30.04.2018. on 09.05.2018, she lodged a complaint of sexual harassment against Respondent 9 (allegedly the head of HCL), claiming the incidents began in the last quarter of 2016. An Internal Complaints Committee was constituted to investigate her complaint. The ICC submitted its report on 19.06.2018, concluding that the allegations were not proved. The petitioner filed a write petition challenging the ICC’s report and constitution. Legal Issues:- 1. Whether the Internal Complaints Committee had jurisdiction to inquire into the complain...